Greenwashing 'Sustainable' Salmon - how supermarkets brand themselves as "responsible" via ClientEarth! https://t.co/aTzLjczZcp @SSC_seafood @ClientEarth @rspcaassured @ASC_aqua @SoilAssociation @GSA_Seafood @ourGSSI @ScotlandSalmon @SalmonTroutCons @Ecohustler @ASA_UK @CMAgovUK pic.twitter.com/rAWoDpGjRH
— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) November 25, 2021
I've campaigned against salmon farming for over two decades and have written extensively on the greenwashing of toxic farmed salmon. But it wasn't until I read a report in Which magazine last month that I began to uncover the full extent of the scam of 'sustainable' seafood. Which magazine reported (6 October 2021):
Pardon my ignorance but this was the first time I'd even heard of the 'Sustainable Seafood Coalition'. I knew that a complaint filed by Fishy Business in 2019 had forced US-owned Loch Duart to drop the use of the word 'sustainable' in their advertising of Scottish salmon but I didn't appreciate the key role of the 'Sustainable Seafood Coalition' whose members include a who's who of supermarkets and who is brokered by ClientEarth.
In July 2021, the Sustainable Seafood Coalition published a 'Strategic Plan' which advanced the vision that "all seafood sold in the UK is from sustainable sources" (a laudable goal but not one that can ever happen if farmed salmon is included):
In view of the Advertising Standards Authority's position against the use of word "sustainable" in relation to Scottish salmon, you would be forgiven for thinking that the Sustainable Seafood Coalition would therefore be supporting a supermarket boycott of farmed salmon.
I did some digging around the operations of the 'Sustainable Seafood Coalition' which ended up in the complaint filed last week with the Advertising Standards Authority (19 November 2021):
The minutes of the meeting on 25 July 2011 included:
Another meeting of the 'Sustainable Seafood Coalition' in June 2012 included:
The distinction between 'sustainable' and 'responsible' appears to be something which supermarkets are still struggling to grapple with a decade later. Animal Concern Advice Line News reported in May 2019 how the Coop (a member of the 'Sustainable Seafood Coalition') had stopped using "sustainable" to describe Scottish salmon but changed it to "responsible":
An email to the Coop from John Robins of Animal Concern Advice Line dated 3 May 2019 concluded:
The Coop replied on 15 May 2019 pledging to remove the "sustainable" description from Scottish salmon:
Here's the reply on 15 May 2019 from John Robins at Animal Concern Advice Line:
When I contacted the 'Sustainable Seafood Coalition' this week I was pleasantly surprised to get a positive response - here's the email correspondence:
Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:03 PM
Subject: "Responsibility" claims by SSC - any update?
To: <[email protected]>
From: Oliver Tanqueray <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: "Responsibility" claims by SSC - any update?
To: Don Staniford <[email protected]>
Cc: ssc <[email protected]>
Hi Don
Thanks for your interest. The sections of the SSC Codes you’ve shared below are still current. You can see them in context in the most recently updated Codes here, on pages 10-11 and 17.
I did notice that the URL you sent is for a page containing a link to an older version of the Codes – I’ve now updated this to make sure the website directs visitors to the latest version of that document.
If SSC work on aquaculture is of interest to you, you might also like to look into our ongoing Feed Working Group – minutes for all those meetings are here. We also have responsible sourcing guidance for businesses buying farmed seafood here (particularly pages 18-26 and 29-30).
Please let me know if you have any other queries or feedback on the work of the SSC.
All the best,
Oliver
Oliver Tanqueray |
Sustainable Seafood Coalition Coordinator |
t. +44 (0)20 3030 5958 Pronouns: he/his |
ClientEarth, The Joinery, 34 Drayton Park, London, N5 1PB |
Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: "Responsibility" claims by SSC - any update?
To: Oliver Tanqueray <[email protected]>
From: Oliver Tanqueray <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 4:37 PM
Subject: RE: "Responsibility" claims by SSC - any update?
To: Don Staniford <[email protected]>
Thanks for your email, and for bringing the complaints you’ve filed to our attention.
With regard to an SSC position on the complaint, I hope the following context and information is helpful:
- The SSC was established in 2011 with the specific intention of ensuring that environmental claims on seafood products are clear, consistent and credible. Like yourself, we had concerns that consumers were being misled by the language used on seafood packaging. At the time, ClientEarth published a labelling report which exposed the inconsistent and misleading labelling practices adopted by many UK supermarkets. In the absence of robust laws controlling environmental claims, we then supported seafood businesses in developing aligned voluntary commitments around responsible sourcing practices and harmonised environmental claims. As part of this process, businesses decided to simplify the types of claims made from seven broad categories (set out in the report linked above) to two – ‘responsibility’ and ‘sustainability’. Members then made public commitments to these Codes, and encouraged their competitors to do so too.
- As highlighted in your complaint, there were discussions around whether it would be appropriate to assign the claim of ‘sustainable’ to any aquaculture sources. Given that credible third-party certification programmes will assess to a level of ‘responsibility’ rather than ‘sustainability’, it was agreed that our voluntary Codes should not exceed those claims. SSC members do not, therefore, make claims of ‘sustainably sourced’ on aquaculture products.
- ‘Responsibly sourced’ can be an indicator of a business’ behaviour & influence on a supply chain, rather than an ecological assessment of the source itself. For example, this claim is often used in wild-capture supply chains where a fishery is not yet sustainable, but where the buyer is supporting a credible improvement project which puts the fishery on a timeline within which it will become sustainable. An SSC member can therefore claim that their aquaculture product is ‘responsibly sourced’ in the following scenarios:
- the source is certified to a third-party responsibility standard OR
- the source is audited to and compliant with a good aquaculture standard or code of practice OR
- the source is audited and this audit identifies necessary improvement actions, and these are communicated with an agreed timescale for completion.
- NB: we set out best-practice criteria for aquaculture third party certification standards on page 21 of the Guidance.
- The SSC isn’t an ecolabel or an assessment body, so our role is not to verify claims or audit specific supply chains. It is the responsibility of individual businesses to justify the claims they make, and we expect members to be transparent around their sourcing and labelling decisions. As per p.16 of the Codes, SSC members agree to provide “sufficient assurance… on request to support any claim”. If you find this not to be the case, please let me know and I will remind specific members of this commitment.
We welcome the perspectives of the ASA, CMA and Trading Standards and will provide any information as needed in their inquiries into your complaints. We appreciate any scrutiny which helps to advance and strengthen the responsibility of seafood supply chains.
All the best
Oliver
Oliver Tanqueray |
Sustainable Seafood Coalition Coordinator |
t. +44 (0)20 3030 5958 Pronouns: he/his |
ClientEarth, The Joinery, 34 Drayton Park, London, N5 1PB |
ClientEarth's response in June 2021 to the Competition and Markets Authority's consultation on 'Misleading environmental claims' is also
Look online and you will be able to download the 'Sustainable Seafood Coalition' voluntary 'Codes of Conduct' (July 2021) which includes:
Another document headed 'Guidance: voluntary codes of conduct' published by the 'Sustainable Seafood Coalition' dated July 2021 includes:
Without a hint of irony, Client Earth have a section of their website on 'Greenwashing':
ClientEarth claims to be challenging supermarkets on fish sourcing:
We’re now more aware of issues around meat consumption, but our knowledge of fish is less clear. Can we limit commercial fishing’s negative impacts through how we buy seafood? We spoke to Oliver Tanqueray, our SSC coordinator, to find out. https://t.co/7sDeIEiOy0 #WorldOceansDay pic.twitter.com/c6Ly6rZnxW
— ClientEarth (@ClientEarth) June 8, 2021
The greenwashing of seafood via dubious certification systems such as the Aquaculture Stewardship Council has plunged new depths.
Here's an op-ed by Adam Daddino of accredited certification assessment provider SCS Global Services published yesterday (24 November 2021) by Seafood Source:
Great view to Glencoe from Marine Harvest Loch Leven farm. Scotland's 1st ASC certified salmon farm. pic.twitter.com/YFwjvJIDzG
— Ally Dingwall (@AllyD_JS) May 1, 2015
Greenwashed scottish salmon @SundayTimesScot https://t.co/h3jLWn2Mch @SalmonTroutCons @SSPOsays @MairiGougeon @MairiMcAllan
— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) October 17, 2021
Our team in Scotland call for Scottish Government to substantiate its claim that #salmonfarming is "sustainable". Their failure to do so will mean that Scottish Government is guilty of blatant greenwash.
— Salmon & Trout Conservation (@SalmonTroutCons) September 30, 2021
Read more here 👉 https://t.co/vxKS5Df4Up
National Geographic: “It’s a toxic industry” says Don Staniford, director of the environmental activism group Scottish Salmon Watch, who regularly sneaks onto Scottish salmon farms, including some owned by Mowi, to record video of dead and dying salmon" https://t.co/McmY9IY6nM pic.twitter.com/yJrTarmFG2
— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) September 24, 2021
Intrafish reported (1 July 2021):
Scottish Salmon Watch reported in March 2021:
Looking forward to more honest advertising by Mowi following their class action lawsuit settlement which outlaws "sustainably sourced" & "all natural" marketing messages @DucktrapRiver @mowisalmon_us https://t.co/Kvw5DI49iy@MowiCanadaWest @ScotlandMowi @TheCounter @natlawreview pic.twitter.com/mFC5c3d5Gr
— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) March 22, 2021
Fish Farming Expert reported (19 March 2021):
Intrafish reported (18 March 2021):
Intrafish's Drew Cherry wrote (18 March 2021):
The hardest job in the world - Fish Health Director for Mowi! Meritxell Diez-Padrisa has taken on an impossible challenge @rspcaassured @ScotlandMowi https://t.co/6ZuI6uw2aM
— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) March 23, 2021
"Mowi is Goodness" claims Mowi's marketing - yet more deceptive advertising! https://t.co/Kvw5DI49iy pic.twitter.com/mgwbCIpzzR
Read more via:
Sunday Times: "Greenwashing claim over effect of fish farming"
Rest Assured - the RSPCA has been captured, co-opted & corrupted by the Salmafia
Result - Applecross Smokehouse deletes "sustainable fisheries" claim following complaint!
Trading Standards Victory: "Our salmon is farm reared" admit Belhaven Smokehouse after complaint!
Complaint re. 'Wild' Shetland Salmon Filed with Trading Standards in East Lothian
BBC News: "Rick Stein's shop changes description of smoked salmon after complaint"
Victory: Rick Stein Forced to Advertise Faroese Farmed Salmon After Trading Standards Investigation
Mowi Moves Goalposts on ASC Certification
Norwegian Government Asked to Divest from 'Unethical' & 'Irresponsible' Scottish Salmon!
ASC-Certified Scottish Salmon Dead in the Water!
Anyone for ASC-Certified Scottish Salmon Doused in Carcinogenic Formaldehyde?
ASC-Certified Shellfish Killers (not to mention seals, diseases, lice, pollution etc)
EXPOSED: Scottish Salmon's Sustainability Scam
Lipstick on a Pig - WWF's Makeover At Marine Harvest
WWF Greenwashes Marine Harvest
The Abominable Salmon Council - Buyer Beware!
Pepé Le Pew Loves Farmed Salmon!
Meet 'Ethics Man' (tobacco billionaire Johan Andresen), Chair of Norway's Council on Ethics which polices 'ethical' investment @FerdOwner @Folketrygdfond https://t.co/4P1m3g2CvT
— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) November 30, 2020
He is a shareholder in salmon farming companies & via @WeAreBenchmark wants to use neonicotinoids! pic.twitter.com/yDq7CeSDvu
Bloomberg: "Sustainably Farmed Atlantic Salmon Isn't Sustainable" @jkarl26 @opinion @business
— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) August 30, 2022
Labels that claim the pink fish is “sustainably farmed” are usually far from honest! @ASC_aqua @SSC_seafood @SoilAssociation @ScotlandSalmon @GSA_Seafood
https://t.co/aayw4Jnbol