Please Come Clean on BMK08!

 

 

 

Scottish Salmon Watch has appealed to the Scottish Information Commissioner (SIC) to force the disclosure of documents in relation to Benchmark's 'Clean Treat' method of lice treatment and has asked both the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) and the Scottish Government to review their refusal of information in relation to the secret chemical treatment BMK08 (perhaps also known as Ectosan).

 

 

 

 

 

Scottish Salmon Watch's letter to the Scottish Government dated 21 February 2020 includes:

 

 

 

The letter went on to cite a plethora of press coverage - including:

 

 

 

 

The review letter to the Scottish Government dated 21 February 2020 concluded:

 

 

 

A similar letter was sent by Scottish Salmon Watch to SEPA dated 21 February 2020.

 

 

The review letter to SEPA concluded:

 

 

 

 

Scottish Salmon Watch's appeal filed with the Scottish Information Commissioner on 21 February 2020 included:

 

 

 

Scottish Salmon Watch's letter of appeal (21 February 2020) concluded:

 

 

So whilst the Scottish Government and SEPA refuse to disclose information on Clean Treat and BMK08 (which could be the same as Ectosan) investors are pumping money in Benchmark. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is BMK08 destined to be a magic bullet or will it be remembered as a toxic trade like a failed Ponzi scheme?  

 

 

 

Whatever the case, surely the public has a right to know certainly before BMK08 is used on Scottish salmon farms (if it has not been used already)?  

 

 

 

 

When asked for a site visit to the Clean Treat operation and specific information on BMK08, Benchmark replied to Scottish Salmon Watch: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So whilst SEPA and the Scottish Government are busy behind the scenes protecting big business from public scrutiny, Benchmark employees continue to pump their own money into Clean Treat and lure in investors betting on the future of BMK08.    Does Benchmark already know that the Scottish Government and SEPA has granted permission to use BMK08 across Scotland?

 

 

 

 

 

 

In December 2019, Scottish Salmon Watch reported:

 

 

Read more via Cleaning Tox-Sick Scottish Salmon

 

 

 

The Sunday Times reported (29 December 2019):

 

 

 

 

In November 2019, Scottish Salmon Watch won a landmark FOI victory when the Scottish Information Commissioner forced the Scottish Government to disclose 'commercially damaging' data on 'Scottish' salmon.

 

 

Read more via:

FOI Victory: Scottish Ministers Forced to Come Clean on 'Scottish' Salmon 

'Scottish' Salmon Exposed As Made in Ireland & Iceland

 

 

 

Scottish Salmon Watch visited Benchmark's Laboratory at Ardtoe in July 2019:

 

 

 

 

SEPA's lack of transparency in terms of toxic chemical use by salmon farming operations is shocking.  Scottish Salmon Watch Tweeted yesterday (26 February 2020):

 

 

 

Read more via:

Sunday Times: "Official fears revealed over toxic threat of salmon trade"

Cleaning Tox-Sick Scottish Salmon

CleanTreat FOI Disclosures by the Scottish Government to Scottish Salmon Watch

Media Backgrounder: Chemically Embalmed Scottish Salmon

All is Not Well With Sick Scottish Salmon

 

 

 

Update:

 

 

 

SEPA refuse to disclose information on the use of the toxic neonicotinoid insecticide Imidacloprid in salmon farming citing commercial confidentiality https://t.co/6dqW4x0iel @ScottishEPA @FOIScotland If disclosed it would prejudice economic interests @WeAreBenchmark @FerdOwner pic.twitter.com/m88qS2Tv2A

— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) June 30, 2020

 

 

From: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM
Subject: Update on Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - 202000275
To: <[email protected]>

Our Ref          202000275
   
11 June 2020
 
Dear Mr Staniford
 
Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner
Public Authority: Scottish Environment Protection Agency

I wrote to you in March to let you know that we were closing the office because of the COVID-19 virus. In line with government guidance, the office premises remain closed.
For the past 12 weeks, my two deputies and I have been working hard to keep the work of the wider Enforcement Team going. While we have been able to accept new applications, respond to enquiries and progress some cases (including issuing a number of decisions), the work we have been able to do has been limited.
The good news is that we are finally able to access our IT systems remotely and so can now access your case file. Five additional members of the team are also now working remotely. We hope to be able to continue to roll out remote access to other members of the Enforcement Team over the next month or so.
I am sorry that your investigation has been delayed, but we should now be able to make some progress. We’ll be in touch as soon as we can.
If you have any questions about your case, or decide you no longer want the investigation to go ahead, please email [email protected]o.
Thank you for your continued patience. 
 
Yours sincerely

Margaret Keyse
Head of Enforcement

 

From: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:24 PM
Subject: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>

Our Ref:     202000275

Date:          17 August 2020

Dear Mr Staniford

Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner

Applicant:  Scottish Salmon Watch (SSW)

Public Authority:  Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)

 

I refer to previous correspondence regarding SSW’s application to the Commissioner.  This relates to its information requests of 23 October 2019 to SEPA, seeking information concerning the treatment of wellboat discharges.

I will investigate SSW’s application and will be your point of contact with this office.  If you have any queries, or would like a progress report at any time, please contact me by email at [email protected].

Scope of investigation

My investigation will be limited to the matter raised in SSW’s application to the Commissioner.  This is to ascertain whether SEPA was entitled to withhold some of the information SSW requested (in part 6 of its request) under the exception in regulation 10(5)(e) (Confidentiality of commercial or industrial information) of the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 (the EIRs).

Public Interest Test

SEPA is withholding some of the information SSW asked for under an exception which is subject to the public interest test, i.e. regulation 10(5)(e) (Confidentiality of commercial or industrial information).  More information about the public interest test can be found here:

http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/Law/FOISA-EIRsGuidance/ThePublicInterestTest/ThePublicInterestTestEIRs.aspx

This means that the Commissioner must balance the public interest in favour of disclosing the information against any public interest there may be in not disclosing it.  I have already noted the public interest arguments set out in SSW’s application to the Commissioner, and note your subsequent emails of 5 and 17 March 2020.   Please let me have any additional comments SSW wishes to submit on why it believes disclosing the information would be in the public interest.

Please provide any further comments by close of business on Tuesday, 1 September 2020.

I will now contact SPEA and give it an opportunity to comment on SSW’s application.  The Commissioner is required, by law, to give authorities an opportunity to comment.

Once I have considered the submissions from both SSW and SEPA, I may contact you again to explore whether it is possible to resolve SSW’s application without the need for a formal Decision Notice.

It is important that you let me know about anything which may be relevant to the investigation.  If SEPA contacts you in relation to SSW’s application, or if SSW finds it no longer needs a decision from the Commissioner, please let me know as soon as possible.   Please also let me know if your contact details change.

Over the last few months, we have received many more applications than usual and our office premises remain closed due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, although staff are working remotely.  This means there might be a slight delay in progressing SSW’s application, however please be assured we will do so as quickly as possible.

I am now on leave until 31 August 2020, however my emails are being monitored in my absence.  On my return, I will be working remotely, normally Mondays to Thursdays.

Information about what we do with the personal information you give us can be found in our Privacy Notice: http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/home/privacy.aspx.  If you would like me to send you a hard copy of the notice, let me know.

It would be helpful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Yours sincerely

Wendy Snedden

Freedom of Information Officer

________________________________________

Scottish Information Commissioner

Kinburn Castle, Doubledykes Road

St Andrews, KY16 9DS

Email:   [email protected]

Web:    www.itspublicknowledge.info

Twitter:  @FOIScotland

 

 

 

From: Don Staniford <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 3:07 PM
Subject: Additional Information re. SEPA 202000275
To: Karin Killington <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

 

Further to Scottish Salmon Watch's appeal filed on 21 February 2020 (posted online via https://donstaniford.typepad.com/my-blog/2020/02/please-come-clean-on-bmk08-.html):

 

Scottish Salmon Watch strongly believes that there is a public interest in the disclosure of information on 'CleanTreat' including BMK08 (Ectosan). 

 

In fact, it was only in March 2020 that Scottish Salmon Watch discovered that BMK08/Ectosan was the toxic neonicotinoid insecticide Imidacloprid (banned by the EU in 2018 for use in terrestrial agriculture).

 

This was reported via The Ferret, ENDS and other publications in March 2020:

 

Revealed: Toxic Neonicotinoid Insecticide Used to 'CleanTreat' Lousy Salmon

The Ferret: "Fish farm companies ‘bidding to use bee-harming pesticide’"

 

ENDS Report: "Calls for greater transparency over ‘toxic’ new fish farm product"

 

Benchmark sea lice treatment identity revealed

 

 

And it forced out a public statement by Benchmark (architects of the CleanTreat system which uses Imidacloprid/BMK08/Ectosan):

 

https://www.benchmarkplc.com/news/bmk08/

 

 

Suffice to say that this controversial disclosure adds considerable weight to Scottish Salmon Watch's appeal.

 

Moreover, Scottish Salmon Watch further revealed in May 2020 (via a FOI disclosure by SEPA) that salmon farming giant Mowi in March 2020 had asked SEPA to support a field trial of Ectosan (re-named BMK08 in November 2019) in Loch Ailort:

 

Secret Trials: 'Royal' Salmon Doused with Bee-Killing Insecticide Imidacloprid?

 

"Mowi asks to trial new lice drug in Scotland"

 

The use of Imidacloprid warranted a letter to the Cabinet Secretary for the Environment from the Scottish Greens in May 2020:

 

Scottish Greens "Deeply Concerned" at Mowi's Field Trial of Neonicotinoid Imidacloprid in Loch Ailort

 

In June 2020, Scottish Salmon Watch published scientific opposition to the use of Imidacloprid (which Benchmark proposes to use via the CleanTreat system):

 

Further Scientific Opposition to Imidacloprid Use in Salmon Farming

 

Scientific Opposition to Neonicotinoid Use in Salmon Farming

 

Backgrounder: "Imidacloprid - A Neonicotinoid Insecticide Toxic to Aquatic Life"

 

Scottish Salmon Watch also published further details on the patents secured by Benchmark (information which we are not even sure that SEPA was in possession of):

 

Patent lifts lid on neonicotinoid use in salmon farming

 

The Sunday Times and BBC Radio featured the controversial issue in June 2020 and British Wildlife viewed the issue as such a public concern that they featured it in their Editorial in August 2020:

 

Sunday Times: "Outlawed insecticide may be used on Scottish salmon"

 

BBC Farming Today on "Neonicotinoids in Salmon Farming"

 

British Wildlife: "Neonics in Salmon Farming - Alarm Bells Are Ringing"

 

 

SEPA's refusal to disclose information on CleanTreat, BMK08, Ectosan and Imidacloprid is an affront to transparency and runs counter to their role as a publicly-funded watchdog for the environment.  Scottish Salmon Watch believes that protecting the commercial interests of a Norwegian-funded industry at the expense of the Scottish environment is unacceptable and unreasonable. 

 

It beggars belief that SEPA are placing the profits of Norway's 5th richest man (Johan Andresen - owner of Ferd Capital which controls Benchmark) before the Scottish environment and public accountability. 

 

Read more via: Follow the Salmoney - the Norwegian tobacco billionaire behind the Neonicotinoid Imidacloprid

 

Scottish Salmon Watch asks the Scottish Information Commissioner to force the disclosure of information in the public interest.  The considerable media coverage of the issue since March 2020 when it was publicly revealed that CleanTreat was a Trojan Horse designed to use a banned neonicotinoid insecticide is evidence enough.

 

Media coverage before Benchmark was forced to publicly admit that BMK08/Ectosan was Imidacloprid is available as reference via Media coverage of Benchmark's 'CleanTreat', Ectosan and BMK08

 

A time-line detailing how the use of Imidacloprid was secured via a patent in Norway back in 2011 is online via Horrible History: Imidacloprid Use in Salmon Farming

 

Please force SEPA to protect the Scottish environment rather than protect the commercial interests of a Norwegian company wanting to keep secret documents detailing the use of a toxic neonicotinoid insecticide. 

 

If you require further information please do not hesitate to contact me on 07771 541826.

 

Please provide a receipt for this email.

 

Thanks,

 

Don Staniford

 

Director, Scottish Salmon Watch

 

 

 

 

From: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:33 PM
Subject: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>

Our Ref:     202000275

Date:          26 October 2020

Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner

Applicant:  Scottish Salmon Watch (SSW)

Public Authority:  Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)

I refer to SSW’s application to the Scottish Information Commissioner dated 21 February 2020, when it asked the Commissioner to investigate whether SEPA complied with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002/the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004, in responding to its request for information concerning the treatment of wellboat discharges.

I write to update you on the progress of the investigation.  We are currently in the process of considering all the submissions in this case, which is taking some time, given the volume of submissions received by both parties, and the amount of withheld information requiring to be considered.  Once this has been completed, my findings will be submitted to our Deputy Head of Enforcement.

In the meantime, should SEPA contact you in relation to your application, please let me know.

Our office premises remain closed due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, however staff are continuing to work remotely.

Yours sincerely

Wendy Snedden

Freedom of Information Officer

________________________________________

Scottish Information Commissioner

Kinburn Castle, Doubledykes Road

St Andrews, KY16 9DS

Email:   [email protected]

Web:    www.itspublicknowledge.info

Twitter:  @FOIScotland

 

 

From: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:45 AM
Subject: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>

Our Ref:     202000275

Date:          3 February 2021

Dear Mr Staniford

Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner

Applicant:  Scottish Salmon Watch

Public Authority:  Scottish Environment Protection Agency

I refer to previous correspondence concerning Scottish Salmon Watch’s application to the Commissioner.  This relates to its information request dated 23 October 2019 to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, seeking information concerning the treatment of wellboat discharges.

When we contacted you at the start of the investigation, we told you that we would send the decision to you by recorded delivery.  The Scottish Parliament has recently changed the law to allow the Commissioner to issue decisions by email.

Now that we’re further on with the investigation, please acknowledge this email to confirm that this is the email address you want us to send the decision to.  If you don’t respond, we won’t be able to issue the decision when it’s ready.

If you change your email address before the decision is issued, please let us know straight away.

Yours sincerely

Wendy Snedden

Freedom of Information Officer

________________________________________

Scottish Information Commissioner

Kinburn Castle, Doubledykes Road

St Andrews, KY16 9DS

Email:   [email protected]

 

 

From: Don Staniford <[email protected]>
Sent: 22 February 2021 12:21
To: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275

Wendy,

I've still not received anything from SEPA or the SIC.

Note the increased urgency:

https://twitter.com/ewangkennedy/status/1363819632759615488

https://twitter.com/TheGAAIA/status/1363786394280333314

https://www.fishfarmingexpert.com/article/new-lice-treatment-method-close-to-commercial-launch/

I look forward to a positive reply.

Don

 

 

On Monday, February 22, 2021, Wendy Snedden <[email protected]> wrote:

Our Ref:     202000275

Date:          22 February 2021

Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner

Applicant:  Scottish Salmon Watch (SSW)

Public Authority:  Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)

 

I acknowledge receipt of your email today seeking an update on SSW’s application to the Scottish Information Commissioner dated 21 February 2020.  SSW asked the Commissioner to investigate whether SEPA complied with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002/the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004, in responding to its request for information concerning the treatment of wellboat discharges.

By way of an update, I can advise you that a decision has been drafted and submitted to our Deputy Head of Enforcement for consideration, prior to final approval.  While this means it shouldn’t be too long until the final decision is issued, in some cases the approver will require further work to be carried out.

Unfortunately I cannot tell you, at this stage, what the final outcome will be, but I am hopeful that a decision will be issued shortly.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

Yours sincerely

Wendy Snedden

Freedom of Information Officer

________________________________________

Scottish Information Commissioner

Kinburn Castle, Doubledykes Road

St Andrews, KY16 9DS

 

 

From: Don Staniford <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>

Thanks - here's a Tweet from a professor at the University of Sussex illustrating once again the public interest in this issue:

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/DaveGoulson/status/1363845996179038213

 

 

From: Don Staniford <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>

Here's another blog detailing the public interest in disclosure of information on Imidacloprid:

 

Nasty Neonicotinoid Plagues Salmon Farming in 2021 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Don

 

 

 

From: Don Staniford <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>

When will the SIC be issuing a ruling?

 

It has been over a year and just this week Benchmark announced that it is closer to using Imidacloprid commercially with the signing of the first customer agreements: Warning: Imidacloprid Moves A Step Closer to Commercial Use in Salmon Farming

 

And it seems Benchmark are currently pressing the European Parliament to approve Imidacloprid for use in salmon farming.

 

The SIC's ruling is vital in bringing the information out into the public domain.

 

Tweets today suggest that CleanTreat does not remove Imidacloprid to anything like the concentrations claimed by Benchmark: https://twitter.com/catcher_skye/status/1375716362291675140

 

The information withheld by SEPA should help shine a light on this toxic neonicotinoid.  If the SIC waits any longer then it will be too late and the toxic genie will be out of the bottle!

 

The scientific evidence of aquatic toxicity of Imidacloprid (BMK08/Ectosan) is all too clear:

 

Further Scientific Opposition to Imidacloprid Use in Salmon Farming 

 

British Wildlife: "Neonics in Salmon Farming - Alarm Bells Are Ringing"

 

Even the patent information rings alarm bells:  Patent lifts lid on neonicotinoid use in salmon farming

 

Best fishes,

 

Don

 

 

 

From: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:35 PM
Subject: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>

Our Ref:     202000275

Date:          29 March 2021

Dear Mr Staniford

Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner

Applicant:  Scottish Salmon Watch

Public Authority:  Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)

I acknowledge receipt of your email today seeking an update on SSW’s application to the Scottish Information Commissioner dated 21 February 2020.  SSW asked the Commissioner to investigate whether SEPA complied with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002/the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004, in responding to its request for information concerning the treatment of wellboat discharges.

I can advise you that SSW’s case is moving through the approval stages in line with our current case load, and the draft decision is now with the Head of Enforcement for consideration prior to final approval.  Hopefully the decision will be issued shortly.

I appreciate your frustration at the length of time it is taking to bring this case to a conclusion and thank you for your patience.

Our office premises remain closed due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, however staff continue to work remotely.

Yours sincerely

Wendy Snedden

Freedom of Information Officer

________________________________________

Scottish Information Commissioner

Kinburn Castle, Doubledykes Road

St Andrews, KY16 9DS

Email:   [email protected]

Web:    www.itspublicknowledge.info

Twitter:  @FOIScotland

 

 

From: Don Staniford <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>

 

Wendy,

 

Do you know when a ruling will be issued?

 

I appreciate that we are in a Covid lockdown and SEPA's has lost lots of data with 4,000 stolen files posted on the Dark Web.  Yet SEPA has found time to streamline and relax rules for salmon farmers. 

 

Alarmingly (hence my repeated email), the trade press reported yesterday that BMK08 (Imidacloprid) had secured an MRL via EU law: https://www.fishfarmingexpert.com/article/sea-lice-medicine-approval-ratified-in-eu-law/

 

As my Tweet this morning asked: "When will Scottish salmon's toxic secrets be revealed? Will the public discover the ecological risks of Imidacloprid (BMK08) AFTER it has been approved?!"

 

Via: https://twitter.com/TheGAAIA/status/1383310409952686091

 

I also just blogged via Warning: Neonicotinoid Imidacloprid Use in Salmon Farming "Clears Another Hurdle" With European MRL 

 

Thanks,

 

Don

 

  

 

When will Scottish salmon's toxic secrets be revealed? Will the public discover the ecological risks of Imidacloprid (BMK08) AFTER it has been approved?!
It's been over a year since an FOI appeal was filed! @FOIScotland @ScottishEPA @WeAreBenchmark https://t.co/AcASvswO4b pic.twitter.com/0ZaL7Nq54c

— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) April 17, 2021

 

 

 

Will the public be able to view environmental risk assessment data on Imidacloprid (BMK08) on the Dark Web before it is approved for use in salmon farming in Scotland? @ScottishEPA @FOIScotland pic.twitter.com/ii4K4i0al5

— Don Staniford (@TheGAAIA) April 18, 2021

 

 

 

From: Wendy Snedden <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 2:49 PM
Subject: Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner - Scottish Salmon Watch and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency - 202000275
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>

Our Ref:     202000275

Date:          19 April 2021

Dear Mr Staniford

Application for Decision by the Scottish Information Commissioner

Applicant:  Scottish Salmon Watch

Public Authority:  Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)

I acknowledge receipt of your email of 17 April 2021 seeking an update on SSW’s application to the Scottish Information Commissioner dated 21 February 2020.  SSW asked the Commissioner to investigate whether SEPA complied with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002/the Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004, in responding to its request for information concerning the treatment of wellboat discharges.

You have asked when the decision notice in this case is likely to be issued.  I have made enquiries today, and can advise you that we hope to issue the decision notice later this week.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

Our office premises remain closed due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, however staff continue to work remotely.

Yours sincerely

Wendy Snedden

Freedom of Information Officer

________________________________________

Scottish Information Commissioner

Kinburn Castle, Doubledykes Road

St Andrews, KY16 9DS

Email:   [email protected]

Web:    www.itspublicknowledge.info

Twitter:  @FOIScotland

 

Read more via Cleaning Tox-Sick Scottish Salmon

 

 

 

The Sunday Times reported (29 December 2019):